NEWRecognition — recognise hard work and the people going above and beyond
FireOptixFire safety software
Assessment & duties

What is a fire risk assessment action plan?

The action plan is the part of a fire risk assessment that lists what must be done, by whom and by when. It is the only part of the assessment that changes the building.

fire risk assessment action plan — diagram The action plan is the part of a fire risk assessment that lists what must be done, by whom and by when. It is the only part of the assessment that changes the building. Assess Hazards, who is at risk,what is already in place Act Findings become datedactions with an owner Record Evidence of what was done,not just decided Review On change, on a near miss,or on time
Where the fire risk assessment action plan sits in the assessment cycle.
Use this diagram

Free to use on your own site, in training material or in a handout, as long as the credit link stays on it. Paste this where you want the diagram to appear.

<figure>
  <img src="https://fireoptix.co.uk/glossary/action-plan/diagram.svg" alt="fire risk assessment action plan — diagram from FireOptix" width="880" height="620" loading="lazy">
  <figcaption>
    <a href="https://fireoptix.co.uk/glossary/action-plan">What is a fire risk assessment action plan?</a> — diagram by
    <a href="https://fireoptix.co.uk">FireOptix</a>
  </figcaption>
</figure>

An assessment without a prioritised action plan has described a building rather than improved it, and that distinction is the first thing an inspecting officer looks for.

Priority is what makes it usable. A wedged fire door and a faded sign are both findings, and a flat list means the urgent one waits behind the cosmetic one until somebody works down the page.

Closure needs evidence attached to the original finding — a photograph, a certificate, a signed record — so that anyone later can see not just that it was closed but what was done.

In practice

A plan where every action is marked high priority.

The assessor was being thorough. The responsible person now has forty high-priority items and no way to sequence them.

Prioritisation that does not discriminate has not been done, and the result is a plan nobody starts.

The useful version orders work by risk and says plainly what must happen first.

What goes wrong in practice

  • Actions with no named owner, which reliably means nobody does them.
  • Everything logged at the same priority, so sequencing is left to whoever picks it up.
  • Closed on a spreadsheet with no evidence behind the tick.